lab 33 - profile lockfs

By

NAME

lab 33 - profile lockfs

NOTES

Last lab I talked up the benefits of lockfs. I started using it in my program in place of channel locks and profiled the code using prof(1) to see it's impact on performance. The results were a little disappointing but not really suprising.

One of the test programs I'm using while developing btree application is a simple indexer. It reads a set of text files, tokenizes each file into a set of Terms, then in the database creates a document id for each document and a termid for each distinct Term and adds to the database a docid-Hit-termid relation. I then run this on a few megabytes of text data; such as all email messages for a year, 

% prof -n folkfs/tok -i index.bt /n/mbox/2001/*/*

I've frequently used prof while developing the btree. Locking always presents a bottleneck. When I had the locks based on channels and a cache that also behaved as a lock, both took up large percentage of samples when profiling lines of code.

The test I did most recently was a single threaded application using lockfs and compared it with the same program without the lockfs. I obviously expected some performance loss when using lockfs but the results showed that even with no blocking for other processes the time it took to interact with lockfs completely dominated the runtime of the program. 54% of samples occurred during the statement 

lock = nil;

And another 33.3% on runtime spent in the lockfs module. The total runtime with lockfs was 32 seconds, and without lockfs 11 seconds.

Even with these results, I will not discard lockfs. The benefits of a distributed, garbage collected lock make it still worth keeping. But I will selectively turn off locking when doing a bulk load of an application. A danger I noticed is that the cost of obtaining and releasing a lock started me thinking about holding locks longer to avoid as much interaction with lockfs, but this just creates a different kind of bottleneck.

The only lesson from this is always prof your code. In Inferno it's easy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

lab 110 - inferno archive edition

By
I've been occupied recently with archiving my digital media. I've been copying home videos on DV tapes to hard-disk, ripping audio CD's to WAV files, gathering photo collections, and trying to copy documents from Iomega disks, floppies, and my dusty old Acorn RiscPC. The plan is to have a copy of this data to give to each of my children. My Dad recently scanned and sent me all his photographs of me and my siblings growing up; he also included pictures of himself and my Mother when they met in Africa. With technology today each generation can build a digital library of family history to hand on to the next generation. In the past a family album may have been passed on to only one person. The accumulation of digital data still presents problems. It requires discipline to store files that are open and not locked into devices or proprietary formats. With digital preservation in mind I've tried to use file formats recommended for long term archiving. WAV files for audio, D
Read more

lab 107 - midiplay

By
NAME lab 107 - midiplay NOTES Midiplay plays back MIDI files. It uses the synthesizer I described in lab 62 and the MIDI module from lab 73. The command takes only one argument, the path to the midi file. I've included one in the lab to demonstrate. Bind the audio device before using it. % bind -a '#A' /dev % midiplay invent15.mid The synthesizer has 16 note polyphony. It uses three oscillators, one at the pitch, one at half pitch, one at double pitch. There is also a filter, two delays and a vibrato. The sample rate is 8000hz and there is one mono channel (MIDI channel events are ignored). It performs well enough to work on my laptop without JIT turned on. All the synthesizer parameters can only be tweaked from inside the code at the moment. FILES lab - 107
Read more

The Cartesian Theater of AI

By
Image
The Cartesian Theater was an intuition pump proposed by philosopher Daniel Dennett to describe a false theory of consciousness. Inside the mind is a stage watched by a humunculus that observes what passes on the stage, hears the sounds, and controls the rest of the mind by responding to the action of what the smaller version of the self sees. Of course, what makes the smaller self conscious? It is an infinite regression. Our understanding of mind is that there is no such theater. There is no one place in the mind that is the locality of consciousness. I want to offer another thought experiment based on the concept of a Cartesian Theater. Imagine a theater containing a screen with a camera pointing at it, and a speaker with a microphone directed toward the speaker. The camera is pointing at the screen. The mic is pointing at the speaker. However, instead of there being an infinite loop due to a direct connection between the camera and screen, insert an AI in the loop. The imag
Read more